Thank you. Your title was sufficient and your post was illustrative. I have written many times about this. The mouthpiece isn't speaking to the panelists, though. The mouthpiece is speaking publicly to the clowns in the world who want a voice, an authority figure to tell them they are right in their delusion. As long as one person in a $4000 jacket will validate the lunies, they can keep running the rest of us like we all belong in their asylum.
I think the main purpose of this panel was an attempt to show that Jan 6 protesters were lunatics. That backfired here as they clearly were much more well informed than anticipated.
I definitely agree with the Regime talking points showing up here and the whole premise to keep the false narrative alive.
It used to be that folks who couldn’t come to terms had the maturity and honesty to end with “agree to disagree” but sadly that ended when people decided that those who didn’t agree should be dubbed criminals. When one side wants to ratchet up unfortunately it forces the rest of us to follow suit simply to maintain our own freedom (or what’s left of it).
Orwell would be so proud...or maybe just disgusted
Thank you. Your title was sufficient and your post was illustrative. I have written many times about this. The mouthpiece isn't speaking to the panelists, though. The mouthpiece is speaking publicly to the clowns in the world who want a voice, an authority figure to tell them they are right in their delusion. As long as one person in a $4000 jacket will validate the lunies, they can keep running the rest of us like we all belong in their asylum.
[Fedpost redacted] is the only solution
I think the main purpose of this panel was an attempt to show that Jan 6 protesters were lunatics. That backfired here as they clearly were much more well informed than anticipated.
I definitely agree with the Regime talking points showing up here and the whole premise to keep the false narrative alive.
It used to be that folks who couldn’t come to terms had the maturity and honesty to end with “agree to disagree” but sadly that ended when people decided that those who didn’t agree should be dubbed criminals. When one side wants to ratchet up unfortunately it forces the rest of us to follow suit simply to maintain our own freedom (or what’s left of it).
Orwell would be so proud...or maybe just disgusted
There’s no unity to be had with anti-civilization destroyers of the world.
Hearing these people speak made me a little less of a misanthrope.
I'll bet they picked this group of Trump supporters based on what they looked like. They didn't expect them to be so well spoken and consistent.