I am going to respond to this video like one of those reaction videos on YouTube. It was sent to me by Buck Johnson of the Counterflow Podcast who is running for City Council in Lockhart, Texas with an eye towards using Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s “What Must Be Done” strategy to fortify his local area from Federal overreach and to start privatizing State functions. You can donate to his campaign
Sure they haven’t violated the NAP, but our children have been castrated, our future children have been aborted and the culture is crumbling down around our fucking ears. No NAP violations though, nothing to see here.
"Stakeholders", to me, is a signal word. I most associate it with the "stakeholder capitalism" concept that has been closely associated with the WEF, and increasingly normalized over the past couple of years. I wouldn't be surprised to see them closely associated with this group, but just as with the proliferation of "critical theory" it may just be attributable to the general infestation of Marxism in the systems of dependence/control. WEF may just be the current distraction/boogeyman.
“And there it is: they want to protect children but not at the expense of insulting the people who would abuse and rape them.”
This is precisely what they feel should be tolerated. Notice how imposing or simply borrowing from belief is big bad, but “tolerance”is baselessly posited as a universal American virtue that must be upheld and preserrrrvved? Says who? Midwit public intellectuals? Mmhmm. Tolerance is satanism. Tolerance of evil is evil in action. No amount of psychobabble or statistical cajoling will move me. The real recidivism rate for these fucking ghouls is atrocious, and anyone who’s studied it in even a cursory way knows that. They don’t change. They evolve. They don’t need help. They need to be caned on the courthouse lawn, and unceremoniously executed for their crimes against the most innocent and defenseless amongst us. Consider the cost of tolerating such things... and what does it say about us, as men, and as a nation, in tolerating the rape of defenseless children?
Wait... You mean everyone at EFF is a pedophile? No one could have seen than coming!!
Joking aside, you hear a lot of talk about the coming fuel shortages and food storages, but what no one has touched on is the impossible amount of fucking rope we’re going to need to clean up this fucking mess.
My problem with this is that I have NO IDEA what they are suggesting. Zero, none. They want it that way. They want people to think this is something like “teaching sex Ed in other words safe sex in schools amounts to less unwanted pregnancies.” I don’t know if that is or was ever actually true. They sure made fun of the parents who thought that abstinence should be taught and suggested those parents were the ones with all the pregnant kids. But were they? They’ve been saying it so long they believe it. And then it shifted to “if we just teach sex Ed -again safe sex to younger and younger children it will prevent unwanted pregnancies.” Then it was like, “ok they are still getting pregnant (possibly more so) so if we teach them about abortions as soon as possible it can prevent unwanted pregnancies.” Did it prevent it or just kill it? Now, it’s like, “if we fuck up their concept of gender and get them on a fuck ton of hormones early on, that will make loads of money to pharma and they won’t ever be able to conceive.” Claps hands, problem solved. But to pretend any of this has something to do with stopping pedophilia or protecting kids from sex work??? Are they suggesting that in the past ten years that they have been pushing their weird sex theories on children that child sex trafficking industry has exploded? The way liberals tend to “solve problems” that stem from their own philosophy is through insistence that the problem isn’t what they did but in fact that what they did wasn’t embraced hard enough and sometimes resisted. It’s like with the masking. Many still believe that we weren’t hard enough with masks and vaccine mandates, despite all evidence to the contrary, to the uselessness and furthermore detriment of both masks and vaccination. I have a feeling what they are noticing is that underage sex trafficking is presently targeting young boys, runaways at a disproportionately higher rate suddenly who are or end up being gay to make money. I know how wrong what I said sounds but if it pays to be gay, tell me that isn’t an incentive. I’d like to know how so many young boys figured out they could easily run away from home and older men would be inclined to pay them for sex almost openly. But rather than solve the problem that created all this, throw hands in the air and insist that if parents were just more onboard with sexuality then it would be ok that their kids are having sex with old guys or running in circles that would get them molested. Let’s just get parents to say “sex work is ok, it’s a legitimate business. Just wait until you are 13.”
They want to protect children but the fat one also wants to allow children to explore kink more. Hans, get the flammenwerfer
Sure they haven’t violated the NAP, but our children have been castrated, our future children have been aborted and the culture is crumbling down around our fucking ears. No NAP violations though, nothing to see here.
"Stakeholders", to me, is a signal word. I most associate it with the "stakeholder capitalism" concept that has been closely associated with the WEF, and increasingly normalized over the past couple of years. I wouldn't be surprised to see them closely associated with this group, but just as with the proliferation of "critical theory" it may just be attributable to the general infestation of Marxism in the systems of dependence/control. WEF may just be the current distraction/boogeyman.
“And there it is: they want to protect children but not at the expense of insulting the people who would abuse and rape them.”
This is precisely what they feel should be tolerated. Notice how imposing or simply borrowing from belief is big bad, but “tolerance”is baselessly posited as a universal American virtue that must be upheld and preserrrrvved? Says who? Midwit public intellectuals? Mmhmm. Tolerance is satanism. Tolerance of evil is evil in action. No amount of psychobabble or statistical cajoling will move me. The real recidivism rate for these fucking ghouls is atrocious, and anyone who’s studied it in even a cursory way knows that. They don’t change. They evolve. They don’t need help. They need to be caned on the courthouse lawn, and unceremoniously executed for their crimes against the most innocent and defenseless amongst us. Consider the cost of tolerating such things... and what does it say about us, as men, and as a nation, in tolerating the rape of defenseless children?
Wait... You mean everyone at EFF is a pedophile? No one could have seen than coming!!
Joking aside, you hear a lot of talk about the coming fuel shortages and food storages, but what no one has touched on is the impossible amount of fucking rope we’re going to need to clean up this fucking mess.
My problem with this is that I have NO IDEA what they are suggesting. Zero, none. They want it that way. They want people to think this is something like “teaching sex Ed in other words safe sex in schools amounts to less unwanted pregnancies.” I don’t know if that is or was ever actually true. They sure made fun of the parents who thought that abstinence should be taught and suggested those parents were the ones with all the pregnant kids. But were they? They’ve been saying it so long they believe it. And then it shifted to “if we just teach sex Ed -again safe sex to younger and younger children it will prevent unwanted pregnancies.” Then it was like, “ok they are still getting pregnant (possibly more so) so if we teach them about abortions as soon as possible it can prevent unwanted pregnancies.” Did it prevent it or just kill it? Now, it’s like, “if we fuck up their concept of gender and get them on a fuck ton of hormones early on, that will make loads of money to pharma and they won’t ever be able to conceive.” Claps hands, problem solved. But to pretend any of this has something to do with stopping pedophilia or protecting kids from sex work??? Are they suggesting that in the past ten years that they have been pushing their weird sex theories on children that child sex trafficking industry has exploded? The way liberals tend to “solve problems” that stem from their own philosophy is through insistence that the problem isn’t what they did but in fact that what they did wasn’t embraced hard enough and sometimes resisted. It’s like with the masking. Many still believe that we weren’t hard enough with masks and vaccine mandates, despite all evidence to the contrary, to the uselessness and furthermore detriment of both masks and vaccination. I have a feeling what they are noticing is that underage sex trafficking is presently targeting young boys, runaways at a disproportionately higher rate suddenly who are or end up being gay to make money. I know how wrong what I said sounds but if it pays to be gay, tell me that isn’t an incentive. I’d like to know how so many young boys figured out they could easily run away from home and older men would be inclined to pay them for sex almost openly. But rather than solve the problem that created all this, throw hands in the air and insist that if parents were just more onboard with sexuality then it would be ok that their kids are having sex with old guys or running in circles that would get them molested. Let’s just get parents to say “sex work is ok, it’s a legitimate business. Just wait until you are 13.”
Thanks for the Stillwater article, was informative. And excellent article from you