Lesbian Kyle Rittenhouse today said "Libertarianism is inherently culturally progressive."
Well, if that's what these progressive "Libertarians" believe I have no moral inhibitions physically removing these frauds from their political home, but I suppose less brutish tactics are also fine.
As Benjamin Tucker once said, "The Anarchists believe in liberty both as an end and means, and are hostile to anything that antagonizes it."
Now, I'm unsure what B. Tucker meant by hostile or what that implies, so I suppose I'll have to fill in the gap with some silicon Machiavellian caulk. I'm a paradoxical thinker like Proudhon anyway, and I can pretty much convince myself that what I'm doing is right, especially when it comes to progressives.
LKR: "Anyone who seeks to conserve the current cultural norms and is willing to use the state to do that is not a libertarian."
When I asked her/him to define "current cultural norms" I got no response. When I responded "you wish to use the state to carry out your progressive nonsense" I got no response.
They know they are lying about being libertarian, we know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying. Any libertarian who believes these crypto-globohomo-tankies, need only watch them weave their language spells to try and fit to their progressive narratives.
I want them exposed for who they really are and systematically removed like you would any termite or roach. 😉
Internal Focus: by-laws and rule changes to make it harder for another entity to do what the LPMC has done/is doing. Pretty quick ascent, you aren't going to want that avenue for eventual challengers. External Focus: Building power in info, econ, and physical domains via networking and diplomacy to wield in and out of politics. As far as I understand it, the LP has little actual power over policy at the moment, so it has to command indirect influence at best, other than an anecdotal sweep occurring at some city council + mayor race. Otherwise, after occupying LP National and the states the LPMC is just now entering the real arena............How fun is that! Watch out it is filled with snake oiled salesmen. I believe they are card carrying members of the duopoly. Good luck out there comrades!
Libertarians can be the most pure and also the most accepting party. It can be the party of having that cake and eating it too. It can do that outside of politics, but inside will require compromise, which is inevitably compromised. And why would you want to join what you rightly define as the enemy? We know the system should be nuked, and that libertarian solutions do everything better. Q: why wait for a plan? iDIY
Lesbian Kyle Rittenhouse today said "Libertarianism is inherently culturally progressive."
Well, if that's what these progressive "Libertarians" believe I have no moral inhibitions physically removing these frauds from their political home, but I suppose less brutish tactics are also fine.
As Benjamin Tucker once said, "The Anarchists believe in liberty both as an end and means, and are hostile to anything that antagonizes it."
Now, I'm unsure what B. Tucker meant by hostile or what that implies, so I suppose I'll have to fill in the gap with some silicon Machiavellian caulk. I'm a paradoxical thinker like Proudhon anyway, and I can pretty much convince myself that what I'm doing is right, especially when it comes to progressives.
And they get mad if anyone uses the language of the Right like Cathedral, but using the language of the Left is AOK
LKR: "Anyone who seeks to conserve the current cultural norms and is willing to use the state to do that is not a libertarian."
When I asked her/him to define "current cultural norms" I got no response. When I responded "you wish to use the state to carry out your progressive nonsense" I got no response.
They know they are lying about being libertarian, we know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying. Any libertarian who believes these crypto-globohomo-tankies, need only watch them weave their language spells to try and fit to their progressive narratives.
I want them exposed for who they really are and systematically removed like you would any termite or roach. 😉
Internal Focus: by-laws and rule changes to make it harder for another entity to do what the LPMC has done/is doing. Pretty quick ascent, you aren't going to want that avenue for eventual challengers. External Focus: Building power in info, econ, and physical domains via networking and diplomacy to wield in and out of politics. As far as I understand it, the LP has little actual power over policy at the moment, so it has to command indirect influence at best, other than an anecdotal sweep occurring at some city council + mayor race. Otherwise, after occupying LP National and the states the LPMC is just now entering the real arena............How fun is that! Watch out it is filled with snake oiled salesmen. I believe they are card carrying members of the duopoly. Good luck out there comrades!
Killing it man!
What if one were to amass power outside of politics and realizes the war is already upon us? Is that still fantasyland?
That is the dream
Libertarians can be the most pure and also the most accepting party. It can be the party of having that cake and eating it too. It can do that outside of politics, but inside will require compromise, which is inevitably compromised. And why would you want to join what you rightly define as the enemy? We know the system should be nuked, and that libertarian solutions do everything better. Q: why wait for a plan? iDIY