For those unaware, one of the most disgraceful state Libertarian Parties WAS the Nevada contingent. Their Twitter account was an ode to woke-leftism in which war was barely mentioned, but “Trans-Rights” and anti-Mises Caucus (MC) rhetoric was prevalent. However, due to boots-on-the-ground activism, that party was purged of that cancerous influence this past weekend, with every elected office filled by someone from the MC. The new Chair of the Nevada Libertarian Party (LP),
Lesbian Kyle Rittenhouse today said "Libertarianism is inherently culturally progressive."
Well, if that's what these progressive "Libertarians" believe I have no moral inhibitions physically removing these frauds from their political home, but I suppose less brutish tactics are also fine.
As Benjamin Tucker once said, "The Anarchists believe in liberty both as an end and means, and are hostile to anything that antagonizes it."
Now, I'm unsure what B. Tucker meant by hostile or what that implies, so I suppose I'll have to fill in the gap with some silicon Machiavellian caulk. I'm a paradoxical thinker like Proudhon anyway, and I can pretty much convince myself that what I'm doing is right, especially when it comes to progressives.
Internal Focus: by-laws and rule changes to make it harder for another entity to do what the LPMC has done/is doing. Pretty quick ascent, you aren't going to want that avenue for eventual challengers. External Focus: Building power in info, econ, and physical domains via networking and diplomacy to wield in and out of politics. As far as I understand it, the LP has little actual power over policy at the moment, so it has to command indirect influence at best, other than an anecdotal sweep occurring at some city council + mayor race. Otherwise, after occupying LP National and the states the LPMC is just now entering the real arena............How fun is that! Watch out it is filled with snake oiled salesmen. I believe they are card carrying members of the duopoly. Good luck out there comrades!
Libertarians can be the most pure and also the most accepting party. It can be the party of having that cake and eating it too. It can do that outside of politics, but inside will require compromise, which is inevitably compromised. And why would you want to join what you rightly define as the enemy? We know the system should be nuked, and that libertarian solutions do everything better. Q: why wait for a plan? iDIY
Lesbian Kyle Rittenhouse today said "Libertarianism is inherently culturally progressive."
Well, if that's what these progressive "Libertarians" believe I have no moral inhibitions physically removing these frauds from their political home, but I suppose less brutish tactics are also fine.
As Benjamin Tucker once said, "The Anarchists believe in liberty both as an end and means, and are hostile to anything that antagonizes it."
Now, I'm unsure what B. Tucker meant by hostile or what that implies, so I suppose I'll have to fill in the gap with some silicon Machiavellian caulk. I'm a paradoxical thinker like Proudhon anyway, and I can pretty much convince myself that what I'm doing is right, especially when it comes to progressives.
Internal Focus: by-laws and rule changes to make it harder for another entity to do what the LPMC has done/is doing. Pretty quick ascent, you aren't going to want that avenue for eventual challengers. External Focus: Building power in info, econ, and physical domains via networking and diplomacy to wield in and out of politics. As far as I understand it, the LP has little actual power over policy at the moment, so it has to command indirect influence at best, other than an anecdotal sweep occurring at some city council + mayor race. Otherwise, after occupying LP National and the states the LPMC is just now entering the real arena............How fun is that! Watch out it is filled with snake oiled salesmen. I believe they are card carrying members of the duopoly. Good luck out there comrades!
What if one were to amass power outside of politics and realizes the war is already upon us? Is that still fantasyland?
Libertarians can be the most pure and also the most accepting party. It can be the party of having that cake and eating it too. It can do that outside of politics, but inside will require compromise, which is inevitably compromised. And why would you want to join what you rightly define as the enemy? We know the system should be nuked, and that libertarian solutions do everything better. Q: why wait for a plan? iDIY