"Pete, you only understand some of what was written, not the whole message." That is one of the main complaints I get from those who adhere to ideologies as religion and regard the books of experts within those ideologies as holy tomes.
Anyone who needs to have this explained to them probably doesn't really need the explanation, but is rather an argumentative online asshole.
Pete, that gay article episode with Charlie was fucking eye opening. I watched on Rumble and was just blown away.
It's intuitive that the gay activists took those steps and i've talked about the marketing leading up to obergefell in the past (love is love), but to see that this was literally a plan that was written out in steps and disseminated in gay publications just had my jaw on the floor.
The difference between dogma and using your brain! It's just like you say - you've read Marx, he diagnoses the situation well, but his prescriptions are absolute dog shit.
One of the best books I've read in the last year was Monkey Business written by the two founders of PETA and the first captive monkeys that started their crusade. I can agree with their compassion of animals to a point and the fact that the medical industrial complex is rotten and has been forever without mindlessly throwing out all my leather pants, eating tofu, and spiking trees.
Also, it's kind of amazing how many on the right these days are at least becoming redpilled on subjects like war and to some extent, the police being weaponized against them. These were almost non-starters for the right just 15-20 years ago.
The moment anyone ventures into the hypothetical, particularly "once the state is gone", nowadays I'm kind of rolling my eyes. I would push that easy button if it existed, but it doesn't. It lures people into a sense of accomplishment by arriving at wonderful conclusions about what freedom COULD mean, while freedom is heading out the back door.
Isn't that a big thing Bruce Lee preached when people would try to get at him for using pieces parts of various martial arts? Take what's useful and leave the rest. I've always been a big proponent of that. If you have to blindly go along with every dictum and letter of any belief system than most of us wouldn't be able to say we believed anything. I was raised Catholic and there's plenty of things are dumb about the Catholic church, that doesn't negate my faith.
There are plenty of brilliant people are there. There aren't ANY infallible ones
It didn't get any press, but my favorite part of the RFK/Rogan interview was when RFK pointed out that in every court case he would be in, each side would have the same number of experts with the same level of credentialing saying opposite things based on which side was paying them.
Anyone who needs to have this explained to them probably doesn't really need the explanation, but is rather an argumentative online asshole.
Pete, that gay article episode with Charlie was fucking eye opening. I watched on Rumble and was just blown away.
It's intuitive that the gay activists took those steps and i've talked about the marketing leading up to obergefell in the past (love is love), but to see that this was literally a plan that was written out in steps and disseminated in gay publications just had my jaw on the floor.
The difference between dogma and using your brain! It's just like you say - you've read Marx, he diagnoses the situation well, but his prescriptions are absolute dog shit.
One of the best books I've read in the last year was Monkey Business written by the two founders of PETA and the first captive monkeys that started their crusade. I can agree with their compassion of animals to a point and the fact that the medical industrial complex is rotten and has been forever without mindlessly throwing out all my leather pants, eating tofu, and spiking trees.
Also, it's kind of amazing how many on the right these days are at least becoming redpilled on subjects like war and to some extent, the police being weaponized against them. These were almost non-starters for the right just 15-20 years ago.
The moment anyone ventures into the hypothetical, particularly "once the state is gone", nowadays I'm kind of rolling my eyes. I would push that easy button if it existed, but it doesn't. It lures people into a sense of accomplishment by arriving at wonderful conclusions about what freedom COULD mean, while freedom is heading out the back door.
Isn't that a big thing Bruce Lee preached when people would try to get at him for using pieces parts of various martial arts? Take what's useful and leave the rest. I've always been a big proponent of that. If you have to blindly go along with every dictum and letter of any belief system than most of us wouldn't be able to say we believed anything. I was raised Catholic and there's plenty of things are dumb about the Catholic church, that doesn't negate my faith.
There are plenty of brilliant people are there. There aren't ANY infallible ones
Bruce Lee we should be like water. Able to fit into whatever vessel you are placed but crushing like the waves. Something like that.
Meh, the belief in the infallibility of experts is bugman dogma.
It didn't get any press, but my favorite part of the RFK/Rogan interview was when RFK pointed out that in every court case he would be in, each side would have the same number of experts with the same level of credentialing saying opposite things based on which side was paying them.
Seems like power is really the only thing.