Why I Changed My Mind On Immigration Part 2
Normally, I don’t repeat a topic two Substacks in a row. Sure, I try to point out as often as I can the war that is being waged on children, but that’s different. The attack on children through forced vaccinations, trans-activists telling tomboys to transition and gay-male kindergarten teachers wanting to indoctrinate them into their lifestyle is clear to those with eyes to see, but so is the incredible danger of illegal immigration. So this morning when I spotted the following Tweet, I knew I had to do a part two:
The account that put out this Tweet has over 3,000 followers. Their reach isn’t on the scale of “Famous Libertarians,” but 333 people “liked” it, and knowing what I know of Twitter algorithms, it’s likely close to 20,000 impressions (the amount of people who have seen it, not interacted with it). Is illegal immigration a victimless crime?
Here are some people who would disagree, if they were still able to:
Justin Lee - 14-years-old
I could keep going, but I hope the point has been driven home. It is likely that these Americans, and countless others, would still be alive if immigration laws were taken seriously. And for so many (especially MANY libertarians) to advocate these people be allowed to just come across the border and enter our culture without so much as a background check or test for infectious diseases is criminal. If certain morons want to argue that “voting is violence,” I would argue advocating for unrestricted immigration makes them complicit in these deaths. And for those who say that people who support the regime’s wars have blood on their hands, so do you if you advocate for open borders.
I have always had "practical AnCap on the brain" which I think is a good thing. There is no immigration without permission of the property owner under AnCap. Having thirty kids to the owners' two kids does not result in a loss of the property to the thirty kids by being outvoted. Since AnCap is our ultimate goal, how does supporting the no-borders position (which is vastly unpopular with normies and voters) move us closer to our goal?
The next time a progressive, who believes they will receive more power from immigration that they allow, makes the "acktually that group is statistically less violent and contributes to society" argument ask them to clarify if right wing and conservative types who are at the bottom of the violence and welfare scale also qualify.